All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: julia.lawall@lip6.fr (Julia Lawall)
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] gboolean -> bool conversion
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:07:18 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1307111451080.2253@hadrien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51DEA75C.10309@monom.org>

> I am pondering if it would be possible to say
>
> - gboolean
> 	when != 'static gboolean func(gpointer)'
> + bool

No, this is not possible.  Is the idea that you don't want to change the
return type of a static function?  Then you can record the position of the
gbooleans that you don't want to change, and only change the others.

An example is as follows:

@keep@
identifier f;
position p;
typedef	gpointer;
identifier i;
@@

static gboolean at p f(gpointer i)	{ ... }

@@
typedef bool;
position p != keep.p;
@@

- gboolean at p
+ bool

Note that you could never refer to

static gboolean func(gpointer)

because it is not a complete syntactic unit.  If you wanted to mention a
prototype, you would need a ; after it.  If you wanted to mention the
definition, then you need to put the complete definition, as shown above.

julia

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-11 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-11  8:17 [Cocci] gboolean -> bool conversion Daniel Wagner
2013-07-11  8:29 ` Julia Lawall
2013-07-11  9:07   ` Daniel Wagner
2013-07-11  9:57     ` Julia Lawall
2013-07-11  9:58     ` Daniel Wagner
2013-07-11 10:24       ` Julia Lawall
2013-07-11 11:17         ` Daniel Wagner
2013-07-11 12:17           ` Julia Lawall
2013-07-11 12:38             ` Daniel Wagner
2013-07-11 13:07               ` Julia Lawall [this message]
2013-07-12  6:55                 ` Daniel Wagner
2013-07-12  7:00                   ` Julia Lawall
2013-07-12  9:08                     ` Daniel Wagner
2013-07-16 14:21                     ` Daniel Wagner
2013-07-16 16:22                       ` Julia Lawall
2013-07-17  8:47                         ` Daniel Wagner
2013-07-17  9:01                           ` Julia Lawall
2013-07-17 14:58                             ` Daniel Wagner
2013-07-17 15:11                               ` Julia Lawall
2013-07-17 15:40                                 ` Daniel Wagner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1307111451080.2253@hadrien \
    --to=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.