From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Walmsley Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] make mach-omap2 boot with device tree only for v3.14 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20131210185902.GO13171@atomide.com> <20131210192726.GR13171@atomide.com> <201312102039.42933.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from utopia.booyaka.com ([74.50.51.50]:45597 "EHLO utopia.booyaka.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751145Ab3LJTot (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 14:44:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201312102039.42933.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Tony Lindgren , arm@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, aida.mynzhasova@skitlab.ru On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 10 December 2013, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > board-ti8168evm.c > > > > I doubt ti8168evm has even worked for a long time.. It's in pretty > > sorry state unfortunately with missing clock support and missing > > handle_irq entry in the board-ti8168evm.c. > > Does that imply the entire ti81xx soc support is lacking, or just > that board specifically? It seems to be the only board file that > ever got merged. We don't really support in mainline for 8148/8168 chips, so this is not much of a regression. TI gave up trying to upstream it several years ago. Aida Mynzhasova has done some work on this recently, but I don't know what the current status is. Maybe she can comment. - Paul From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [GIT PULL] make mach-omap2 boot with device tree only for v3.14 In-Reply-To: <201312102039.42933.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20131210185902.GO13171@atomide.com> <20131210192726.GR13171@atomide.com> <201312102039.42933.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 10 December 2013, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > board-ti8168evm.c > > > > I doubt ti8168evm has even worked for a long time.. It's in pretty > > sorry state unfortunately with missing clock support and missing > > handle_irq entry in the board-ti8168evm.c. > > Does that imply the entire ti81xx soc support is lacking, or just > that board specifically? It seems to be the only board file that > ever got merged. We don't really support in mainline for 8148/8168 chips, so this is not much of a regression. TI gave up trying to upstream it several years ago. Aida Mynzhasova has done some work on this recently, but I don't know what the current status is. Maybe she can comment. - Paul