From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751513Ab3LKWWq (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:22:46 -0500 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:36926 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751076Ab3LKWWn (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:22:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 23:22:29 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Len Brown cc: Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Mike Galbraith , Linux PM list , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jeremy Eder , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: 50 Watt idle power regression bisected to Linux-3.10 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1386478624.4748.19.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1386559014.4875.16.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1386652637.5374.72.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1386732093.5964.6.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20131211113839.GF21683@pd.tnic> <20131211115239.GA21999@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Len Brown wrote: > For the record... > > intel_idle doesn't check that bit because it doesn't run on model 29 -- > the Xeon 7400 was the "Dunnington" 4-socket generation based on Core2. Right, we wondered about the restricted model check already. Interesting that this is a 4 socket issue as well. > Until now, i was not aware that this issue might apply to models other > than that one. > > Checking w/ the HW guys... I hope they are not equally surprised :) Thanks, tglx