From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Austin Subject: Re: Regression caused by "ASoC: core: Rework SOC_DOUBLE_R_SX_TLV add SOC_SINGLE_SX_TLV" Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:31:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20140130144807.5b102b28@skate> <20140130160554.694a8a84@skate> <20140130175658.11469081@skate> <20140130181607.6a694b8f@skate> <20140210152244.19f9d647@skate> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0096.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.96]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2A22650DD for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:31:06 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20140210152244.19f9d647@skate> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Lior Amsalem , Brian Austin , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Ezequiel Garcia , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Gregory_Cl=E9ment?= List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Brian Austin, > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:23:57 -0600, Brian Austin wrote: > >>>> SOC_DOUBLE_R_SX_TLV("Analog Playback Volume", >>>> CS42L51_AOUTA_VOL, CS42L51_AOUTB_VOL, >>>> - 0, 0x34, 0xE4, aout_tlv), >>>> + 8, 0xffffff19, 0x18, aout_tlv), >>>> SOC_DOUBLE_R_SX_TLV("ADC Mixer Volume", >>>> >>>> shifting 8 on an 8bit register? >>> >>> These values are just the ones that were here before your commit >>> 1d99f2436d0d1c7741d6dfd9d27b5376cdbbca40. I didn't invent anything, >>> just reverted partially your commit. >>> >> Oh yes, of course. I was just making the comment that it looks very >> strange to have that shift value. I'm glad it works for your system and >> you can go forward with your development. >> >> Once I get it figured out, I'll CC you on the submission for your review >> and test. > > Any news about this volume control problem on cs42l51 ? > > Thanks! > > Thomas Hello Thomas, I found the issue WRT the CS42L51. It was actually the shift values for the kcontrols were wrong :) I have the changes and will be sending the patch shortly. Your CC'd as reporter if that's OK. Thanks, Brian