From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 12/21] can: c_can": Work around C_CAN RX wreckage
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 22:13:08 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404142212530.22697@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <20140411080547.845836199@linutronix.de> <20140411080652.540058139@linutronix.de> <1607542.s21fNX8q9K@ws-stein>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:49316 "EHLO
	Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754817AbaDNUM5 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-can@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:12:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1607542.s21fNX8q9K@ws-stein>
Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-can.vger.kernel.org>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Cc: linux-can <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>, Mark <mark5@del-llc.com>

On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Alexander Stein wrote:

> I think the " in the subject got there by accident :-)

Definitely :)