From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] xen/pass-through: constify some static data Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:43:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5571AA3B020000780008152E@mail.emea.novell.com> <5571AC870200007800081573@mail.emea.novell.com> <558051D30200007800085959@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4sY7-0003Zb-6G for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:13:15 +0000 In-Reply-To: <558051D30200007800085959@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 16.06.15 at 16:27, wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> This is done indirectly by adjusting two typedefs and helps emphasizing > >> that the respective tables aren't supposed to be modified at runtime > >> (as they may be shared between devices). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini > > Perhaps patch 5 and 6 could go in right away, without waiting > for the issues on the other ones addressed? After all, it may > well be that patch 1 will be dropped following the discussion on > the hypervisor side patch series... Yes, I'll queue them up.