From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758162Ab3KHUO6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:14:58 -0500 Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:44861 "EHLO mail-qa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757781Ab3KHUO4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:14:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:23:07 -0500 (EST) From: Vince Weaver To: Frederic Weisbecker cc: Vince Weaver , Steven Rostedt , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Jones Subject: Re: perf/tracepoint: another fuzzer generated lockup In-Reply-To: <20131108200244.GB14606@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20131108200244.GB14606@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > There seem to be a loop that takes too long in intel_pmu_handle_irq(). Your two > previous reports seemed to suggest that lbr is involved, but not this one. I may be wrong but I think everything between and is just noise from the NMI perf-event watchdog timer kicking in. Why that code would be reading the LBR registers I don't know. Vince