From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933717AbaGYNzL (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2014 09:55:11 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:57181 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932866AbaGYNzI (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2014 09:55:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:55:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov , Linux PM list , Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq: Rework IRQF_NO_SUSPENDED In-Reply-To: <2634160.AMXQm5EuML@vostro.rjw.lan> Message-ID: References: <20140724212620.GO3935@laptop> <13290270.IfKaUSRMLR@vostro.rjw.lan> <2634160.AMXQm5EuML@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > If the face of your remark about the level-triggered interrupts that's all moot. It's not only level. That you notice right away. But for edge you lose the edge and some devices will wait forever that their irq is handled. Not fun to debug :) Thanks, tglx