Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/arm64: add xenconfig

From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
	x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>,
	josh@joshtriplett.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	sam@ravnborg.org, Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/arm64: add xenconfig
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:11:04 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1502251310170.18097__30507.4753742248$1424898774$gmane$org@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=NE6VhWX18LELbWPygQ103ohgyjQF3nVrLBx3S1-92zgPf=Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

> I am reworking Xen's kconfig stuff right now, so perhaps what is best
> is for this series to be folded under those changes and I'd submit
> them as the last series in the changes. That would avoid collateral
> changes as I revamp tons of Xen kconfig things. This would then go
> under David Vrabel's tree, but since it involves x86 stuff its unclear
> if its OK for that -- I think so? Let me know.
> 

Ok, sounds good, and I agree it would be better to hold off on doing this 
if there are going to be substantial changes to the config options later.  
I think once the x86 bits get an ack from one of the x86 guys that you 
should be good to go!