From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754736AbbERT3I (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 15:29:08 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:42126 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754145AbbERT3F (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 15:29:05 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,454,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="727932504" Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 12:27:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Vikas Shivappa X-X-Sender: vikas@vshiva-Udesk To: Thomas Gleixner cc: Vikas Shivappa , Vikas Shivappa , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, Matt Fleming , "Auld, Will" , peter.zijlstra@intel.com, h.peter.anvin@intel.com, "Juvva, Kanaka D" , mtosatti@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] x86/intel_rdt: Adds support for Class of service management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1431370976-31115-1-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> <1431370976-31115-3-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 18 May 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 18 May 2015, Vikas Shivappa wrote: >> On Fri, 15 May 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 11 May 2015, Vikas Shivappa wrote: >>>> arch/x86/include/asm/intel_rdt.h | 38 +++++++++++++ >>>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.c | 112 >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>>> include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h | 4 ++ >>> >>> Where is the Documentation for the new cgroup subsystem? >> >> Documentation/cgroups/rdt.txt > > That's where it should be, but according to the diffstat it is not. It > comes as the last patch in the series, but it should be there with the > patch which introduces the subsystem or even before that. Agree :) . i realized this later after i sent the email and mentioned it in next email , but that way i did the same exact mistake - eh! cant even call that recursion i dont know. Thanks, Vikas > > And the features which are added in subsequent patches should be > reflected with updates to the documentation. > > Thanks, > > tglx >