All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	jgross@suse.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18 "Consolidate get_dma_ops..."
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:17:05 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1704261016450.2875@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170426171348.GE9406@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:00:30AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:22:00AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > > On 24/04/17 20:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > > Given the outstanding regression we need to fix as soon as possible,
> > > > > > I'll queue these patches on the xentip tree for 4.12.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It looks like there is another rc for 4.11. I am wondering whether you could
> > > > > try to send a pull request to Linus so it can be fixed in 4.11?
> > > > 
> > > > No, especially without input from Russell.
> > > 
> > > You could add a "Fixes" tag to the first patch so that it gets
> > > back-ported to 4.11.x once it hits mainline (the second patch is just
> > > cosmetic):
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 815dd18788fe ("treewide: Consolidate get_dma_ops() implementations")
> > 
> > I did add:
> > 
> >   Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>        [4.11+]
> > 
> > I thought that would be enough to trigger a backport?
> 
> Either would do. I didn't see it in the patch you posted, that's why I
> mentioned it.

Thanks, I appreciated it!

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sstabellini@kernel.org (Stefano Stabellini)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18 "Consolidate get_dma_ops..."
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:17:05 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1704261016450.2875@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170426171348.GE9406@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:00:30AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:22:00AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > > On 24/04/17 20:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > > Given the outstanding regression we need to fix as soon as possible,
> > > > > > I'll queue these patches on the xentip tree for 4.12.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It looks like there is another rc for 4.11. I am wondering whether you could
> > > > > try to send a pull request to Linus so it can be fixed in 4.11?
> > > > 
> > > > No, especially without input from Russell.
> > > 
> > > You could add a "Fixes" tag to the first patch so that it gets
> > > back-ported to 4.11.x once it hits mainline (the second patch is just
> > > cosmetic):
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 815dd18788fe ("treewide: Consolidate get_dma_ops() implementations")
> > 
> > I did add:
> > 
> >   Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>        [4.11+]
> > 
> > I thought that would be enough to trigger a backport?
> 
> Either would do. I didn't see it in the patch you posted, that's why I
> mentioned it.

Thanks, I appreciated it!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-26 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-13 21:04 [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm,arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18 "Consolidate get_dma_ops..." Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-13 21:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: " Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-13 21:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen/arm,arm64: rename __generic_dma_ops to xen_get_dma_ops Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-13 21:04   ` [PATCH 2/2] xen/arm, arm64: " Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-14  0:48   ` [PATCH 2/2] xen/arm,arm64: " Boris Ostrovsky
2017-04-14  0:48     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-04-14  2:14     ` [PATCH 2/2] xen/arm, arm64: " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-04-14  2:14     ` [PATCH 2/2] xen/arm,arm64: " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-04-14  2:14       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-04-14  0:48   ` [PATCH 2/2] xen/arm, arm64: " Boris Ostrovsky
2017-04-13 21:04 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-18 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18 "Consolidate get_dma_ops..." Catalin Marinas
2017-04-18 14:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-19 17:25   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-19 17:25   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-19 17:25     ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-19 18:20     ` Juergen Gross
2017-04-19 18:20       ` Juergen Gross
2017-04-19 18:32       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-19 18:32       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-19 18:32         ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-19 18:20     ` Juergen Gross
2017-04-24 19:16     ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-24 19:16     ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-24 19:16       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-25 12:51       ` Julien Grall
2017-04-25 12:51       ` Julien Grall
2017-04-25 12:51         ` Julien Grall
2017-04-25 17:22         ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-25 17:22         ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-25 17:22           ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-26 11:19           ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-26 11:19             ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-26 17:00             ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-26 17:00             ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-26 17:00               ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-26 17:13               ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-26 17:13               ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-26 17:13                 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-26 17:17                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-26 17:17                 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2017-04-26 17:17                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-26 11:19           ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-18 14:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-13 21:04 Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1704261016450.2875@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260 \
    --to=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.