From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752896AbdGMWH6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2017 18:07:58 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:26353 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751017AbdGMWH5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2017 18:07:57 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,356,1496127600"; d="scan'208";a="127083618" Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:09:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Shivappa Vikas X-X-Sender: vikas@vshiva-Udesk To: Thomas Gleixner cc: Vikas Shivappa , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, vikas.shivappa@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, andi.kleen@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/21] x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Add cpus file support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1498503368-20173-1-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> <1498503368-20173-14-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2 Jul 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> { >> + struct rdtgroup *pr = rdtgrp->parent, *cr; > > *pr and *cr really suck. We used r before rdtgroup. pr would be parent rdtgrp. Wanted to keep them short as there are more in this function. prgrp can be used if thats not ok?