From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751927AbaJEVaR (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2014 17:30:17 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:52091 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751366AbaJEVaN (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2014 17:30:13 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 23:30:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ben Hutchings cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86: Reject x32 executables if x32 ABI not supported In-Reply-To: <1412386843.9388.176.camel@decadent.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <1410120305.6822.9.camel@decadent.org.uk> <1412386843.9388.176.camel@decadent.org.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Can one of you please respond to this patch? Oops. Slipped through the cracks. Picked it up. Shouldn't it be tagged for stable? Thanks, tglx