From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760848AbbA2CD4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:03:56 -0500 Received: from mx1.scotdoyle.com ([23.226.141.211]:60230 "EHLO mx1.scotdoyle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754564AbbA2CD1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:03:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:14:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Scot Doyle To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , Vivek Goyal cc: lkml , "linux-man@vger.kernel.org" , Kexec Mailing List , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Young , "H. Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , "Eric W. Biederman" , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Edited kexec_load(2) [kexec_file_load()] man page for review In-Reply-To: <20150128203402.GG15342@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <545FBDDD.9060801@gmail.com> <20141111213037.GA31445@redhat.com> <54ADA284.30502@gmail.com> <20150112221634.GD16162@redhat.com> <54B91271.3000600@gmail.com> <20150127142459.GA12851@redhat.com> <54C89816.8030709@gmail.com> <20150128144803.GC15342@redhat.com> <20150128203402.GG15342@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > > Hello Vivek, > > > > >> I've made various adjustments to the page in the light of your comments > > >> above. Thanks! > > > > > > Thank you for following it up and improving kexec man page. > > > > You're welcome. So, by now, I've made quite a lot of changes > > (including adding a number of cases under ERRORS). I think the revised > > kexec_load/kexec_file_load page is pretty much ready to go, but would > > you be willing to give the text below a check over first? > > > > Hi Michael, > > I had a quick look and it looks good to me. > > Thanks > Vivek When I tested, kexec_file_load required CONFIG_RELOCATABLE. Is the same true for kexec_load? Would it make sense to note this in the man pages along with the need for CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE, etc? Or as an error message? Thanks, Scot From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scot Doyle Subject: Re: Edited kexec_load(2) [kexec_file_load()] man page for review Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <545FBDDD.9060801@gmail.com> <20141111213037.GA31445@redhat.com> <54ADA284.30502@gmail.com> <20150112221634.GD16162@redhat.com> <54B91271.3000600@gmail.com> <20150127142459.GA12851@redhat.com> <54C89816.8030709@gmail.com> <20150128144803.GC15342@redhat.com> <20150128203402.GG15342@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150128203402.GG15342-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+glkk-kexec=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , Vivek Goyal Cc: "linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Kexec Mailing List , lkml , Andy Lutomirski , Andi Kleen , Borislav Petkov , "Eric W. Biederman" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Dave Young List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > > Hello Vivek, > > > > >> I've made various adjustments to the page in the light of your comments > > >> above. Thanks! > > > > > > Thank you for following it up and improving kexec man page. > > > > You're welcome. So, by now, I've made quite a lot of changes > > (including adding a number of cases under ERRORS). I think the revised > > kexec_load/kexec_file_load page is pretty much ready to go, but would > > you be willing to give the text below a check over first? > > > > Hi Michael, > > I had a quick look and it looks good to me. > > Thanks > Vivek When I tested, kexec_file_load required CONFIG_RELOCATABLE. Is the same true for kexec_load? Would it make sense to note this in the man pages along with the need for CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE, etc? Or as an error message? Thanks, Scot From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.scotdoyle.com ([2602:ffea:1:10d::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YGZyG-0005BI-IS for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:16:21 +0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:14:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Scot Doyle Subject: Re: Edited kexec_load(2) [kexec_file_load()] man page for review In-Reply-To: <20150128203402.GG15342@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <545FBDDD.9060801@gmail.com> <20141111213037.GA31445@redhat.com> <54ADA284.30502@gmail.com> <20150112221634.GD16162@redhat.com> <54B91271.3000600@gmail.com> <20150127142459.GA12851@redhat.com> <54C89816.8030709@gmail.com> <20150128144803.GC15342@redhat.com> <20150128203402.GG15342@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , Vivek Goyal Cc: "linux-man@vger.kernel.org" , Kexec Mailing List , lkml , Andy Lutomirski , Andi Kleen , Borislav Petkov , "Eric W. Biederman" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Dave Young On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > > Hello Vivek, > > > > >> I've made various adjustments to the page in the light of your comments > > >> above. Thanks! > > > > > > Thank you for following it up and improving kexec man page. > > > > You're welcome. So, by now, I've made quite a lot of changes > > (including adding a number of cases under ERRORS). I think the revised > > kexec_load/kexec_file_load page is pretty much ready to go, but would > > you be willing to give the text below a check over first? > > > > Hi Michael, > > I had a quick look and it looks good to me. > > Thanks > Vivek When I tested, kexec_file_load required CONFIG_RELOCATABLE. Is the same true for kexec_load? Would it make sense to note this in the man pages along with the need for CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE, etc? Or as an error message? Thanks, Scot _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec