From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752588AbbBWS1M (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:27:12 -0500
Received: from resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.43]:57157 "EHLO
	resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752321AbbBWS1K (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:27:10 -0500
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:27:08 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org
To: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Aaron Jones <aaronmdjones@gmail.com>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linuxfoundation.org,
        "Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@kernel.org>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>,
        Markku Savela <msa@moth.iki.fi>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1
In-Reply-To: <20150223181553.GE25477@ubuntumail>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1502231226330.22398@gentwo.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1502051554500.4876@gentwo.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1502230856400.21238@gentwo.org> <20150223161625.GD25477@ubuntumail> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1502231041580.21784@gentwo.org> <20150223164623.GB32181@mail.hallyn.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.11.1502231049110.21926@gentwo.org> <20150223181553.GE25477@ubuntumail>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Serge Hallyn wrote:

> > So the cap was dropped from the cap perm set but it is still active
> > in the ambient set?
>
> Right, and the legacy program doesn't know to check the new set.

Does it have to? The ambient set could not show up in permitted.