From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sage Weil Subject: Re: v0.94.6 Hammer released Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:57:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <1456736629334.47610@croc.ru> <191489558.55229005.1456744289131.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1456745435596.21796@croc.ru> <56D45CCC.8010608@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323329-1315070058-1456761476=:1904" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56D45CCC.8010608-cLsNCMjd+0JAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ceph-users-bounces-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org Sender: "ceph-users" To: Loic Dachary Cc: "Franklin M. Siler" , Xiaoxi Chen , "ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , ceph-users List-Id: ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-1315070058-1456761476=:1904 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The intention was to continue building stable releases (0.94.x) on the ol= d=20 list of supported platforms (which inclues 12.04 and el6). I think it wa= s=20 just an oversight that they weren't built this time around. I the=20 overhead to doing so is just keeping a 12.04 and el6 jenkins build slave=20 around. Doing this builds in the existing environment sounds much better than=20 trying to pull in externally built binaries... sage On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Dan & al, >=20 > I think it would be relatively simple to have these binaries published = as part of the current "Stable release" team effort[1]. Essentially doing= what you did and electing a central place to store these binaries. The t= rick is to find a sustainable way to do this which means having a process= that is simple to maintain and understand as well as enough of us to mai= ntain that in the long run. >=20 > The basic idea is to copy the packages that are build by gitbuilders or= by the buildpackage teuthology task in a central place. Because these pa= ckages are built, for development versions as well as stable versions[2].= And they are tested via teuthology. The packages that are published on h= ttp://ceph.com/ are rebuilt from scratch, using the process that Alfredo = described. This is fine for the supported platforms and for the stable re= leases. But for the development releases and the platforms that are no lo= nger supported but still built by gibuilders, we could just copy the pack= ages over. >=20 > Does that sound sensible ? >=20 > [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO > [2] http://gitbuilder.ceph.com/ >=20 >=20 > On 29/02/2016 20:28, Dan van der Ster wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Odintsov Vladislav wrote: > >> Can you please provide right way for building rpm packages? > >=20 > > It's documented here: > > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/install/build-ceph/#rpm-package-mana= ger > >=20 > > For 0.94.6 you need to change the .spec file to use .tar.gz (because > > there was no .bz2 published for some reason). And then also grab > > init-ceph.in-fedora.patch from here: > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ceph/ceph/master/rpm/init-ceph.in-f= edora.patch > >=20 > > BTW, I've put our build here: > > http://linuxsoft.cern.ch/internal/repos/ceph6-stable/x86_64/os/ > > These are unsigned, untested and come with no warranty, no guarantees > > of any sort. And IMHO, no third party build would ever to give that > > warm fuzzy trust-it-with-my-data feeling like a ceph.com build would > > ;) > >=20 > > Moving forward, it would be great if the required community effort > > could be put to work to get ceph.com el6 (and other) builds. For el6 > > in particular there is also the option to help out the Centos Storage > > SIG to produce builds. I don't have a good feeling which direction is > > better ... maybe both. > >=20 > > -- Dan > > CERN IT Storage Group > >=20 > >=20 > >> ________________________________ > >> Regards, > >> > >> Vladislav Odintsov > >> > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: Shinobu Kinjo > >> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 14:11 > >> To: Odintsov Vladislav > >> Cc: Franklin M. Siler; Xiaoxi Chen; ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; ceph= -users; Sage Weil > >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released > >> > >> Can we make any kind of general procedure to make packages so that a= lmost everyone in community build packages by themselves and reduce devel= opers work load caused by too much requirement -; > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Shinobu > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Odintsov Vladislav" > >> To: "Franklin M. Siler" , "Xiaoxi Chen" > >> Cc: ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "ceph-users" , = "Sage Weil" > >> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 6:04:02 PM > >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> should we build el6 packages ourself or, it's hoped that these packa= ges would be built officially by community? > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> Regards, > >> > >> Vladislav Odintsov > >> > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: ceph-devel-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org on behalf of Franklin M. Siler > >> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 05:03 > >> To: Xiaoxi Chen > >> Cc: Alfredo Deza; Dan van der Ster; Sage Weil; ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TZNg+MwTxZMZA@public.gmane.org= l.org; ceph-users > >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released > >> > >> On Feb 25, 2016, at 1839, Xiaoxi Chen wrote= : > >> > >>> Will we build package for ubuntu 12.04 (Precise)? > >>> Seems it also doesnt show in the repo > >> > >> The Ceph packages provided by Ubuntu are old. However, the Ceph pro= ject publishes its own packages. > >> > >> http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/dists/precise/ > >> > >> so repo lines for sources.list would be, I think: > >> > >> deb http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/ precise main > >> deb-src http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/ precise main > >> > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Frank Siler > >> Siler Industrial Analytics > >> 314.799.9405-- > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel= " in > >> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ceph-users mailing list > >> ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org > >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ceph-users mailing list > >> ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org > >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel"= in > > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >=20 --8323329-1315070058-1456761476=:1904 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com --8323329-1315070058-1456761476=:1904--