From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC046B0257 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:15:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id mv3so19693939igc.0 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:15:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v76si20745605ioi.35.2015.12.10.07.15.51 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:15:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:15:50 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 8/9] slab: implement bulk free in SLAB allocator In-Reply-To: <20151209215058.0ef5964a@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20151208161751.21945.53936.stgit@firesoul> <20151208161903.21945.33876.stgit@firesoul> <20151209195325.68eaf314@redhat.com> <20151209215058.0ef5964a@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Vladimir Davydov , Joonsoo Kim , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , David Miller On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > True. I was just so close submitting the network use-case to DaveM. > Guess, that will have to wait if we choose this API change (and > I'll have to wait another 3 month before the trees are in sync again). why? Andrew can push that to next pretty soon and DaveM could carry that patch too. > > Then we need df.slab_cache or something. > > What about df.page->slab_cache (?) Fine come up with a patch. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org