From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936322AbcLUU3t (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:29:49 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:60190 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934737AbcLUU3s (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:29:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:27:00 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Thomas Petazzoni cc: LKML , Sebastian Siewior , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [patch 10/10] irqchip/armada-xp: Consolidate hotplug state space In-Reply-To: <20161221212235.77e590c8@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: References: <20161221191947.089046759@linutronix.de> <20161221192112.333161745@linutronix.de> <20161221212235.77e590c8@free-electrons.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:19:57 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > The mpic is either the main interrupt controller or sits behind a GIC. But > > there is no way that both variants are available on the same system. > > By "both variants", you mean the MPIC acting as the main interrupt > controller on one side, and the MPIC acting as a "cascaded" controller, > child of the GIC on the other side ? > > If that's what you meant, then indeed it's correct. Yes. I'll rephrase that. Thanks, tglx