From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753248AbdCMUVh (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:21:37 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:38793 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752369AbdCMUV1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:21:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 21:21:19 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: David Carrillo-Cisneros cc: Stephane Eranian , "Luck, Tony" , Vikas Shivappa , "Shivappa, Vikas" , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "mingo@kernel.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "Shankar, Ravi V" , "Yu, Fenghua" , "Kleen, Andi" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/cqm: Cqm requirements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1488908964-30261-1-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F6120F0A9@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote: > >> I am ok removing the perf-like CPU filtering from the requirements. > > > > So if I'm not missing something then ALL remaining requirements can be > > solved with the RDT integrated monitoring mechanics, right? > > > > Right. Excellent.