All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@cavium.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Only disable affinity settings if pre and post vector count is equal to max_vecs and not min_vecs
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:25:54 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703301622500.23529@dut5108.mv.qlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170330232120.GC2496@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>


Hi Bjorn,

On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, 4:21pm, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:29:28PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:31:58PM -0800, Himanshu Madhani wrote:
> > > From: Michael Hernandez <michael.hernandez@cavium.com>
> > > 
> > > min_vecs is the minimum amount of vectors needed to operate in MSI-X mode
> > > which may just include the vectors that don't need affinity.
> > > 
> > > Disabling affinity settings causes the qla2xxx driver scsi_add_host
> > > to fail when blk_mq is enabled as the blk_mq_pci_map_queues expects
> > > affinity masks on each vector.
> > > 
> > > v2 --> v3
> > > o fixed code as per review comments.
> > > 
> > > v1 --> v2
> > > 
> > > o Moved the check from pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity() to
> > >   __pci_enable_{msi|msix}_range()
> > > 
> > > Fixes: dfef358 ("PCI/MSI: Don't apply affinity if there aren't enough vectors left")
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Hernandez <michael.hernandez@cavium.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@cavium.com>
> > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/msi.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> > >  1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> > > index 7f73bac..46c0cdd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> > > @@ -1091,6 +1091,15 @@ static int __pci_enable_msi_range(struct pci_dev *dev, int minvec, int maxvec,
> > >  
> > >  	for (;;) {
> > >  		if (affd) {
> > > +			/*
> > > +			 * If there aren't any vectors left after applying the
> > > +			 * pre/post vectors don't bother with assigning
> > > +			 * affinity.
> > > +			 */
> > > +			if (affd->pre_vectors + affd->post_vectors == nvec)
> > > +				affd = NULL;
> > > +		}
> > 
> > I don't really like this because affd->pre_vectors and
> > affd->post_vectors are not PCI MSI concepts.  I think they really
> > belong in irq/affinity.c, e.g., maybe this could be checked in
> > irq_create_affinity_masks().
> > 
> > If that could be done, we wouldn't have to duplicate the checks here
> > for both MSI and MSI-X.
> > 
> > I raised a similar question earlier:
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170202173659.GD21267@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com
> 
> I want to make progress on this, but that means a little conversation
> here.  Maybe we want to merge this patch as-is, but I'd like to hear
> the reasons why it wouldn't really work to move the checks to
> irq/affinity.c.
> 
> For now I'll mark it as "changes requested" in patchwork, which means
> it will fall off my to-do list until it's reposted.
>

Sorry for going silent on this patch. We've been working internally to 
update patch as per your suggestion. I am planning to repost new patch 
once we have completed our testing.  I should be able to post updated 
patch sometimes next week for your review. 

> > > +		if (affd) {
> > >  			nvec = irq_calc_affinity_vectors(nvec, affd);
> > >  			if (nvec < minvec)
> > >  				return -ENOSPC;
> > > @@ -1138,6 +1147,15 @@ static int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_dev *dev,
> > >  
> > >  	for (;;) {
> > >  		if (affd) {
> > > +			/*
> > > +			 * If there aren't any vectors left after applying the
> > > +			 * pre/post vectors don't bother with assigning
> > > +			 * affinity.
> > > +			 */
> > > +			if (affd->pre_vectors + affd->post_vectors == nvec)
> > > +				affd = NULL;
> > > +		}
> > > +		if (affd) {
> > >  			nvec = irq_calc_affinity_vectors(nvec, affd);
> > >  			if (nvec < minvec)
> > >  				return -ENOSPC;
> > > @@ -1209,13 +1227,6 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
> > >  
> > >  		if (affd->pre_vectors + affd->post_vectors > min_vecs)
> > >  			return -EINVAL;
> > > -
> > > -		/*
> > > -		 * If there aren't any vectors left after applying the pre/post
> > > -		 * vectors don't bother with assigning affinity.
> > > -		 */
> > > -		if (affd->pre_vectors + affd->post_vectors == min_vecs)
> > > -			affd = NULL;
> > >  	} else {
> > >  		if (WARN_ON(affd))
> > >  			affd = NULL;
> > > -- 
> > > 1.7.1
> > > 
> 

Thanks,
- Himanshu

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-30 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-01 23:31 [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Only disable affinity settings if pre and post vector count is equal to max_vecs and not min_vecs Himanshu Madhani
2017-03-01 23:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-07 19:00   ` Madhani, Himanshu
2017-03-07 21:08     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-23 17:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-30 23:21   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-30 23:25     ` Himanshu Madhani [this message]
2017-03-31  0:09       ` Bjorn Helgaas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-04-18  1:19 Himanshu Madhani
2017-05-17 22:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-05-18 16:02   ` Himanshu Madhani
2017-04-17 21:26 Himanshu Madhani
2017-04-18  0:01 ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-23 21:01 Himanshu Madhani
2017-02-28 22:05 ` Madhani, Himanshu
2017-03-01 15:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-01 23:27   ` Madhani, Himanshu
2017-02-23  6:12 Himanshu Madhani
2017-02-23 10:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-21 17:34 Himanshu Madhani
2017-02-23  0:27 ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1703301622500.23529@dut5108.mv.qlogic.com \
    --to=himanshu.madhani@cavium.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.