From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932839AbdCaIFa (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 04:05:30 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:39736 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932545AbdCaIF0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 04:05:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:05:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Andrey Ryabinin cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, hpa@zytor.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, hch@lst.de, mingo@elte.hu, jszhang@marvell.com, joelaf@google.com, joaodias@google.com, willy@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic() In-Reply-To: <20170330102719.13119-2-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Message-ID: References: <20170330102719.13119-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> <20170330102719.13119-2-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > vfree() can be used in any atomic context now, thus there is no point > in vfree_atomic(). > This reverts commit 8d5341a6260a ("x86/ldt: use vfree_atomic() > to free ldt entries") > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f200.google.com (mail-wr0-f200.google.com [209.85.128.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3E16B03A3 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 04:05:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr0-f200.google.com with SMTP id v44so14765861wrc.9 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 01:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de. [2a01:7a0:2:106d:700::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4si7070026wrr.224.2017.03.31.01.05.26 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 01:05:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:05:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic() In-Reply-To: <20170330102719.13119-2-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Message-ID: References: <20170330102719.13119-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> <20170330102719.13119-2-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, hpa@zytor.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, hch@lst.de, mingo@elte.hu, jszhang@marvell.com, joelaf@google.com, joaodias@google.com, willy@infradead.org On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > vfree() can be used in any atomic context now, thus there is no point > in vfree_atomic(). > This reverts commit 8d5341a6260a ("x86/ldt: use vfree_atomic() > to free ldt entries") > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org