From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753336AbdEPWqm (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2017 18:46:42 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:41882 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751342AbdEPWql (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2017 18:46:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 00:46:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Steven Rostedt cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [patch V2 17/17] sched: Enable might_sleep() and smp_processor_id() checks early In-Reply-To: <20170516151236.3ca5d9ae@gandalf.local.home> Message-ID: References: <20170516184231.564888231@linutronix.de> <20170516184736.272225698@linutronix.de> <20170516151236.3ca5d9ae@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 16 May 2017, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2017 20:42:48 +0200 > Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > + > > + /* > > + * Enable might_sleep() and smp_processor_id() checks. > > + * They cannot be enabled earlier because with CONFIG_PRREMPT=y > > My cat's version of CONFIG_PREEMPT, it's CONFIG_ PRR EMPT! I don't have a cat and I don't need one for creating typos. I'm perfectly able to do that myself :) > > + * kernel_thread() would trigger might_sleep() splats. With > > + * CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y the init task might have scheduled > > + * already, but it's stuck on the kthreadd_done completion. > > + */ > > + system_state = SYSTEM_SCHEDULING; > > + > > complete(&kthreadd_done); > > > > /* > > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > > @@ -6226,8 +6226,10 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, in > > > > if ((preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset) && !irqs_disabled() && > > !is_idle_task(current)) || > > - system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING || oops_in_progress) > > + system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING || system_state > SYSTEM_RUNNING || > > + oops_in_progress) > > return; > > + > > if (time_before(jiffies, prev_jiffy + HZ) && prev_jiffy) > > return; > > prev_jiffy = jiffies; > > --- a/lib/smp_processor_id.c > > +++ b/lib/smp_processor_id.c > > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ notrace static unsigned int check_preemp > > /* > > * It is valid to assume CPU-locality during early bootup: > > */ > > - if (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING) > > + if (system_state < SYSTEM_SCHEDULING) > > Do we want to ignore halting or rebooting too? I don't think so. After setting those states, interesting stuff like device_shutdown() gets invoked. We want the coverage there. Thanks, tglx