From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753582AbdKXOYC (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:24:02 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:47443 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753557AbdKXOX6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:23:58 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:23:56 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ingo Molnar cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , "H . Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/43] x86/entry/64: Remove the SYSENTER stack canary In-Reply-To: <20171124091448.7649-20-mingo@kernel.org> Message-ID: References: <20171124091448.7649-1-mingo@kernel.org> <20171124091448.7649-20-mingo@kernel.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote: > From: Andy Lutomirski > > Now that the SYSENTER stack has a guard page, there's no need for a > canary to detect overflow after the fact. Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner