From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753236AbdLHKa7 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 8 Dec 2017 05:30:59 -0500
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:55528 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752962AbdLHKaz (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 8 Dec 2017 05:30:55 -0500
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:30:52 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@mblankhorst.nl>
cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3
In-Reply-To: <57c8679e-1b88-c9ad-2299-2bea7560b28f@mblankhorst.nl>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712081129450.1840@nanos>
References: <CA+55aFxPBszFBt91KRNBrsQdJ10b+6fh9ySNzSKSX7JOq4WRPw@mail.gmail.com> <168050887.sZlTFXWCmO@aspire.rjw.lan> <CA+55aFwsMuHUBQz5kDNwRf17JnasXMWjvmLq5qXGH-694yeq1w@mail.gmail.com> <20171206121452.GA6320@dhcp22.suse.cz> <db81e89d-eee6-868c-dc10-c028f4c4be84@mblankhorst.nl>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712061344560.1724@nanos> <0f1d3d63-fa10-5cef-8014-81753dc60243@mblankhorst.nl> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712061514420.1724@nanos> <57c8679e-1b88-c9ad-2299-2bea7560b28f@mblankhorst.nl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 06-12-17 om 15:15 schreef Thomas Gleixner:
> > On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 06-12-17 om 13:46 schreef Thomas Gleixner:
> >>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >>>> Op 06-12-17 om 13:15 schreef Michal Hocko:
> >>>>> "No irq handler" part looks a bit scary (maybe related to lost affinity
> >>>>> messages?) but the following messages look quite as well. Is this
> >>>>> something known? The system seems to be up and running without any
> >>>>> visible issues.
> >>>> Another reproducer for https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198033 ?
> >>>> Symptoms are similar..
> >>> Well, the spurious interrupt is one thing, but you obviously lose
> >>> interrupts for some reason.
> >>>
> >>> Did you ever manage to get the data out which I asked for?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> 	tglx
> >>>
> >> Yes, sent this out about an hour ago
> >>
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/6/215
> > Weird. Did not reach me
> >
> But do you have any idea?

Can you please provide the full trace, dmesg and the full output of
.../debug/irq/... ?

Thanks,

	tglx