From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753658AbdLNQaI (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:30:08 -0500
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:37897 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753618AbdLNQaF (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:30:05 -0500
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:29:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Rob Herring <rob.herring@linaro.org>, Jonas Oberg <jonas@fsfe.org>,
        linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
        Charlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@gmail.com>,
        Carmen Bianca Bakker <carmenbianca@fsfe.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 01/11] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe
 how to properly identify file licenses
In-Reply-To: <1513268719.27409.63.camel@perches.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712141729370.4998@nanos>
References: <20171116183306.103584007@linutronix.de>  <20171116184358.398030394@linutronix.de>  <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711171057240.1709@nanos> <1513268719.27409.63.camel@perches.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 11:00 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > spdx
> 
> Is there something preventing this from being applied
> to some tree included in -next?

Nothing than me being busy and not coming around to fix the last review
comments.