From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753268AbeABOnL (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 09:43:11 -0500 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:14365 "EHLO mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753133AbeABOnG (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 09:43:06 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,497,1508796000"; d="scan'208";a="307405148" Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:43:01 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: SF Markus Elfring cc: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, Gilles Muller , Himanshu Jha , Masahiro Yamada , Michal Marek , Nicolas Palix , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rename_the_SmPL_script_=E2=80=9Ckzalloc-=E2=80=A6=2Ecocci=E2=80=9D=3F?= In-Reply-To: <96aee198-15b2-dc96-a349-d8a70d06dc67@users.sourceforge.net> Message-ID: References: <96aee198-15b2-dc96-a349-d8a70d06dc67@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323329-1008439410-1514904181=:24055" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-1008439410-1514904181=:24055 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Now I find that it became more advanced than the previous version. > >> How do you think about to update also the corresponding file name > >> (instead of keeping the word “simple” there)? > > > > Why not send a patch for it yourself? > > * I would like to check your views around renaming of such files. > > * I am unsure which name will be better finally. > Would we like to achieve another permalink here? Actually, according to th original name choice it is stillsimple, becaue it doesn't account for the possibility of many statement between the alloc and the memset and it doesn't account for different ways of expressing the size between the two calls. If you want to be more general than kzalloc, then perhaps zalloc-simple.cocci would be ok. julia --8323329-1008439410-1514904181=:24055-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julia Lawall Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 14:43:01 +0000 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Rename_the_SmPL_script_=E2=80=9Ckzalloc-=E2=80=A6=2Ecocci=E2=80=9D=3F?= Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-1008439410-1514904181=:24055" List-Id: References: <96aee198-15b2-dc96-a349-d8a70d06dc67@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <96aee198-15b2-dc96-a349-d8a70d06dc67@users.sourceforge.net> To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-1008439410-1514904181=:24055 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Now I find that it became more advanced than the previous version. > >> How do you think about to update also the corresponding file name > >> (instead of keeping the word “simple” there)? > > > > Why not send a patch for it yourself? > > * I would like to check your views around renaming of such files. > > * I am unsure which name will be better finally. > Would we like to achieve another permalink here? Actually, according to th original name choice it is stillsimple, becaue it doesn't account for the possibility of many statement between the alloc and the memset and it doesn't account for different ways of expressing the size between the two calls. If you want to be more general than kzalloc, then perhaps zalloc-simple.cocci would be ok. julia --8323329-1008439410-1514904181=:24055-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: julia.lawall@lip6.fr (Julia Lawall) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:43:01 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Cocci] =?utf-8?q?Rename_the_SmPL_script_=E2=80=9Ckzalloc-?= =?utf-8?b?4oCmLmNvY2Np4oCdPw==?= In-Reply-To: <96aee198-15b2-dc96-a349-d8a70d06dc67@users.sourceforge.net> References: <96aee198-15b2-dc96-a349-d8a70d06dc67@users.sourceforge.net> Message-ID: To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Now I find that it became more advanced than the previous version. > >> How do you think about to update also the corresponding file name > >> (instead of keeping the word ?simple? there)? > > > > Why not send a patch for it yourself? > > * I would like to check your views around renaming of such files. > > * I am unsure which name will be better finally. > Would we like to achieve another permalink here? Actually, according to th original name choice it is stillsimple, becaue it doesn't account for the possibility of many statement between the alloc and the memset and it doesn't account for different ways of expressing the size between the two calls. If you want to be more general than kzalloc, then perhaps zalloc-simple.cocci would be ok. julia