From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kbuild-all@01.org,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
0day robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] OPTIONAL: cpufreq/intel_pstate: fix debugfs_simple_attr.cocci warnings
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 21:44:02 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803292140340.2750@hadrien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5CLpW+2yCYRwAJTPWtXgXkaPGyPQrB3cbBGYvV1fryUQw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Julia,
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:
> > Use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE rather than DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE
> > for debugfs files.
> >
> > Semantic patch information:
> > Rationale: DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE + debugfs_create_file()
> > imposes some significant overhead as compared to
> > DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE + debugfs_create_file_unsafe().
>
> Just curious: could you please expand on what "imposes some
> significant overhead" means?
I don't know. I didn't write this rule. Nicolai, can you explain?
thanks,
julia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-29 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-29 19:12 [PATCH] OPTIONAL: cpufreq/intel_pstate: fix debugfs_simple_attr.cocci warnings Julia Lawall
2018-03-29 19:11 ` Francisco Jerez
2018-03-29 19:31 ` [kbuild-all] " Fabio Estevam
2018-03-29 19:23 ` Francisco Jerez
2018-03-29 19:44 ` Julia Lawall [this message]
2018-03-30 6:14 ` Nicolai Stange
2018-03-30 6:22 ` Julia Lawall
2018-03-30 15:33 ` Fabio Estevam
2018-03-31 4:20 ` Nicolai Stange
2018-03-30 9:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1803292140340.2750@hadrien \
--to=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=currojerez@riseup.net \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nstange@suse.de \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.