From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753198AbeDBRUy (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2018 13:20:54 -0400 Received: from resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.40]:40602 "EHLO resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753063AbeDBRUx (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2018 13:20:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:20:51 -0500 (CDT) From: Christopher Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@nuc-kabylake To: Rao Shoaib cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, joe@perches.com, willy@infradead.org, brouer@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kfree_rcu() should use kfree_bulk() interface In-Reply-To: <1522647064-27167-3-git-send-email-rao.shoaib@oracle.com> Message-ID: References: <1522647064-27167-1-git-send-email-rao.shoaib@oracle.com> <1522647064-27167-3-git-send-email-rao.shoaib@oracle.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfFMFPZU1tbXEQcmT/IbsogkiDjX6HY5U1zoSmu5K+uRxNeRLfPaPTVmUdMpoW4NhldkNL4m3lm4VDdXlrDHLXo/OA31CJQl/GVwMyhAceAsFPK6NkMXh vyewVkGGXbWFp30lAk+AAy4StmFx8IrdoBHPtJs9hAfKq7CIhEJ0jkQbzj2jmjbKGe8qrksob4wWuh28zqrs6oVZNDZvT3iVZRjekTF0MGik2FFjla1evVW8 wygVov0Z00nOlGB+UtbFsXeuEJpR792IUC+ju3vpuXI04eBo9DypgV0I8E8YmYGX06X8VJWoOBZGo15r69VUwM6qAMEr+4463et8C/NpzJWt2gZIX/rNEy1A +yTfBS+b Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, rao.shoaib@oracle.com wrote: > kfree_rcu() should use the new kfree_bulk() interface for freeing > rcu structures as it is more efficient. It would be even better if this approach could also use kmem_cache_free_bulk() or kfree_bulk()