From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
gavin.hindman@intel.com, vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com,
dave.hansen@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 11/22] x86/intel_rdt: Associate pseudo-locked regions with its domain
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:18:12 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1802201815550.24268@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9551bc69-1183-cc36-7ed9-5b949ce924cc@intel.com>
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> On 2/20/2018 2:00 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> >> In addition to the above research from my side I also followed up with
> >> the CPU architects directly to question the usage of these instructions
> >> instead of wbinvd.
> >
> > What was their answer? This really wants a proper explanation and not just
> > experimentation results as it makes absolutely no sense at all.
>
> I always prefer to provide detailed answers but here I find myself at
> the threshold where I may end up sharing information not publicly known.
> This cannot be the first time you find yourself in this situation. How
> do you prefer to proceed?
Well, if it's secret sauce we'll have to accept it. Though it really does
not improve the confidence in all those mechanisms ....
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-13 15:46 [RFC PATCH V2 00/22] Intel(R) Resource Director Technology Cache Pseudo-Locking enabling Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 01/22] x86/intel_rdt: Documentation for Cache Pseudo-Locking Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 20:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-19 22:15 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 22:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-19 22:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 21:27 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-02-19 22:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 02/22] x86/intel_rdt: Make useful functions available internally Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 03/22] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce hooks to create pseudo-locking files Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 04/22] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce test to determine if closid is in use Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 05/22] x86/intel_rdt: Print more accurate pseudo-locking availability Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 06/22] x86/intel_rdt: Create pseudo-locked regions Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 20:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-19 23:02 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 23:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-20 3:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 07/22] x86/intel_rdt: Connect pseudo-locking directory to operations Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 08/22] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce pseudo-locking resctrl files Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 21:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 09/22] x86/intel_rdt: Discover supported platforms via prefetch disable bits Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 10/22] x86/intel_rdt: Disable pseudo-locking if CDP enabled Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 11/22] x86/intel_rdt: Associate pseudo-locked regions with its domain Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 21:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-19 23:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 23:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-20 3:17 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-20 10:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-20 16:02 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-20 17:18 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 12/22] x86/intel_rdt: Support CBM checking from value and character buffer Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 13/22] x86/intel_rdt: Support schemata write - pseudo-locking core Reinette Chatre
2018-02-20 17:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-20 18:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-20 23:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-21 1:58 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-02-21 6:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-21 8:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-21 5:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-27 0:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-27 10:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-27 15:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-27 19:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-27 21:33 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-28 18:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-28 19:17 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-28 19:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-27 21:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-28 17:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-28 17:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-28 18:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-28 18:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 14/22] x86/intel_rdt: Enable testing for pseudo-locked region Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 15/22] x86/intel_rdt: Prevent new allocations from pseudo-locked regions Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 16/22] x86/intel_rdt: Create debugfs files for pseudo-locking testing Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 17/22] x86/intel_rdt: Create character device exposing pseudo-locked region Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 18/22] x86/intel_rdt: More precise L2 hit/miss measurements Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 19/22] x86/intel_rdt: Support L3 cache performance event of Broadwell Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 20/22] x86/intel_rdt: Limit C-states dynamically when pseudo-locking active Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 21/22] mm/hugetlb: Enable large allocations through gigantic page API Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 22/22] x86/intel_rdt: Support contiguous memory of all sizes Reinette Chatre
2018-02-14 18:12 ` [RFC PATCH V2 00/22] Intel(R) Resource Director Technology Cache Pseudo-Locking enabling Mike Kravetz
2018-02-14 18:12 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-02-14 18:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-14 18:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-15 20:39 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-15 20:39 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-15 21:10 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-02-15 21:10 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1802201815550.24268@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=gavin.hindman@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.