From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <tglx@linutronix.de>
Received: from p4fea4eb5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.234.78.181] helo=nanos)
	by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
	(Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <tglx@linutronix.de>)
	id 1fKpz6-0006VI-CS
	for speck@linutronix.de; Mon, 21 May 2018 20:56:40 +0200
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 20:56:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Date/Time?
In-Reply-To: <0d7325d3-7882-7f24-a4e1-2df1259adaca@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1805212054520.1599@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <20180519172627.GB1239@kroah.com>
 <ab610f46-9e42-a9f6-5a79-65be1f3dc552@redhat.com>
 <20180521164655.GI17976@kroah.com>
 <0d7325d3-7882-7f24-a4e1-2df1259adaca@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: speck@linutronix.de
List-ID: <speck.linutronix.de>

On Mon, 21 May 2018, speck for Jon Masters wrote:
> One of the problems does seem to be that we didn't have a dedicated list
> for v4 earlier. I think it's important to tackle that next time around.

Crap. What's important is that _WE_ can decide and act on our own without
having to ask Intel about every fart.

Thanks,

	tglx