From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BB2C04AAF for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 07:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE11A21743 for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 07:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726969AbfEUH0C (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2019 03:26:02 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:59915 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726006AbfEUH0B (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2019 03:26:01 -0400 Received: from p5b06daab.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.6.218.171] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hSz9q-0008RK-Jc; Tue, 21 May 2019 09:25:59 +0200 Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 09:25:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Kate Stewart cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 16/25] treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 41 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20190520170750.949430150@linutronix.de> <20190520170858.008906948@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 May 2019, Kate Stewart wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > You might want to tweak this match a bit to include the prior > line, otherwise its going to look a bit weird after the patch is > applied. Specifically: > > * This module: > - * This module is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > - * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License > - * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version > - * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. > > Leaving a dangling "This module:" with nothing following will be a bit weird. I'll teach the patcher to remove that.