From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3EEC282CE for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 13:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF39820862 for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 13:41:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EF39820862 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lip6.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4PDf4jh006750; Sat, 25 May 2019 15:41:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0AE7752; Sat, 25 May 2019 15:41:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFC5A774C for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 15:41:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4PDf19r011411 for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 15:41:01 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,511,1549926000"; d="scan'208";a="307195885" Received: from smb-adpcdg1-02.hotspot.hub-one.net (HELO hadrien) ([213.174.99.130]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 May 2019 15:41:01 +0200 Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 15:41:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: <14711fc9-6071-3f3b-9f99-1b0f56c2b4d6@web.de> Message-ID: References: <81b409c6-5986-5961-5edf-843c6737d88c@web.de> <0782D580-3DD6-4419-B5E1-C04215FB2E3B@lip6.fr> <4FE72A81-9D85-4786-898C-A84E2AC5B520@lip6.fr> <14711fc9-6071-3f3b-9f99-1b0f56c2b4d6@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-309149042-1558791661=:2799" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sat, 25 May 2019 15:41:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Sat, 25 May 2019 15:41:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 Cc: Coccinelle Subject: Re: [Cocci] accessing comments X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-309149042-1558791661=:2799 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sat, 25 May 2019, Markus Elfring wrote: > > There is one in an argument list that is within a statement. > > This would only matter for the second call of the function “foo” > in the example function “main”, wouldn't it? > https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/210ce894d2dd1572fff9e1c98ae443e6df14f4c7/demos/comments.c#L2 > > > How does your software decide which comment should be treated > as simple text before or after an item? It takes all of the comments before (up to the preceding non comment token if any) within and after (up to the following non comment token if any). I'm not sure what happens at the end of a function. I suspect that the end of a function is the end. The comments that are before the start of the next function are not considered to be after the function that precedes them. julia --8323329-309149042-1558791661=:2799 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci --8323329-309149042-1558791661=:2799--