From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@oracle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jon Grimm <Jon.Grimm@amd.com>,
kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
patrick.colp@oracle.com, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode: Add an option to reload microcode even if revision is unchanged
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:51:18 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1909051244250.1902@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190905072029.GB19246@zn.tnic>
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 05:21:32PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> > But echo 2 > reload would allow reading a microcode file from
> > /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/ even if the revision hasn't changed right?
> >
> > #echo 1 > reload wouldn't load if the revision on disk is same as what's loaded,
> > and we want to permit that with the echo 2 option.
>
> Then before we continue with this, please specify what the exact
> requirements are. Talk to your microcoders or whoever is going to use
> this and give the exact use cases which should be supported and describe
> them in detail.
Plus I have to ask whether this facility makes any sense outside of
microcode development. If so, then please explain the use case and give
a proper justification why this needs to be in the mainline kernel.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-05 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-29 5:33 [PATCH] x86/microcode: Add an option to reload microcode even if revision is unchanged Ashok Raj
2019-08-29 5:38 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-08-29 6:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-29 13:02 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-03 16:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-04 22:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-04 22:12 ` Boris Petkov
2019-09-05 0:21 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-05 7:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-05 10:51 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-09-05 19:40 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-05 19:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-05 20:20 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-05 21:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-05 22:27 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-06 7:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-06 12:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-06 14:40 ` Johannes Erdfelt
2019-09-06 15:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-06 15:46 ` Johannes Erdfelt
2019-09-06 16:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-06 16:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-09-06 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-06 16:52 ` Johannes Erdfelt
2019-09-06 17:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-06 21:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-07 0:33 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-07 10:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-16 10:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-17 0:31 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-17 6:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-09-17 6:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-17 14:29 ` Raj, Ashok
2019-09-19 19:48 ` Mihai Carabas
2019-09-06 16:55 ` Raj, Ashok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1909051244250.1902@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=Jon.Grimm@amd.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mihai.carabas@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.colp@oracle.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.