From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39661C07E9C for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 20:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3F361874 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 20:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230480AbhGHUv4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:51:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49608 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230238AbhGHUvy (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:51:54 -0400 Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [IPv6:2001:4190:8020::34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73072C061574; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 13:49:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id 35E9192009C; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 22:49:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E2A92009B; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 22:49:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 22:49:11 +0200 (CEST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Nikolai Zhubr , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" cc: Arnd Bergmann , x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] x86/PCI: SiS PIRQ router updates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Posted as an RFC at this stage as it still has to be verified. So this has passed verification as it is, although with an extra change, not directly related. Shall I repost the series unchanged with the "RFC" annotation removed then, or can it go in as posted? Maciej