From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBC3C433EF for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 17:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239910AbiEXRSc (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2022 13:18:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51814 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239546AbiEXRSb (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2022 13:18:31 -0400 Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [IPv6:2001:4190:8020::34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1456638BC6; Tue, 24 May 2022 10:18:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id 8FE1592009C; Tue, 24 May 2022 19:18:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D3A92009B; Tue, 24 May 2022 18:18:28 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 18:18:28 +0100 (BST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Florian Fainelli cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer , Paul Cercueil , Nathan Chancellor , Tiezhu Yang , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Rewrite `csum_tcpudp_nofold' in plain C In-Reply-To: <7682977b-5929-890a-3a18-662fbfcede5c@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <7682977b-5929-890a-3a18-662fbfcede5c@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 May 2022, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > I have visually inspected code produced and verified this change to boot > > with TCP networking performing just fine, both with a 32-bit and a 64-bit > > configuration. Sadly with the little endianness only, because in the > > course of this verification I have discovered the core card of my Malta > > board bit the dust a few days ago, apparently in a permanent manner, and I > > have no other big-endian MIPS system available here to try. > > How about QEMU is not that a viable option for testing big/little endian > configurations? Yeah, for this particular change, sure. I don't have QEMU set up however at the moment and would have to take some time to sort it, and it won't do for peripherals it doesn't implement. The failure is a fresh problem and I yet need to figure out what to do about it. A bad coincidence I guess as I have MIPS hardware 10 years older that still goes strong. Maciej