From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB91C4321A for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A863D214DA for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sifive.com header.i=@sifive.com header.b="T6kWLJqr" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726888AbfF1SxB (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:53:01 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com ([209.85.166.68]:42516 "EHLO mail-io1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726563AbfF1SxA (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:53:00 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id u19so6141735ior.9 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:53:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=0vnkzi3BuJTyXx7KRAPPLKqoLRHPgMrkqNHgPj4DsWE=; b=T6kWLJqrYH5JG0ZpMsTWJYlyGp9L3SPHrYqLjVPcryv7lQnYlvRo3gyaCu9yw18RST Z87ehkfmmJPrNWqwbVGwO9zaTzKN6gap4ePTLSce7dgy/LWbvt+j+oH15CCz/kDxDRXT kU+5cB/xXZA8kY42vlqCnC82yo2PhgaWetCTG/BFjvvO3NEjkfHPPtVNtIdzkmKPSV9n sn1Tqp6C8V/RzMRtEteqgpcaDUHN/M557MGODv7f7gUChAz0zOz3c5iizFfLdZikIwK0 pGDBZemdSCGyArGmU3wNXGeWyE+g30zZSvPbbAKcxM1YICX3RCRnUn/dMCGi84YW3huv IBLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=0vnkzi3BuJTyXx7KRAPPLKqoLRHPgMrkqNHgPj4DsWE=; b=C+MtD/JVPcpfpqcjV9f35PnAhdgphYXUrthCBrkCRfmWjyxaYBzXiooUlCC4Mnd2VT jefmzQYVc3elVArtpIrTy4j2DhDQe6UnjyWDTkRElayEJ87pIjVqmT7sARC8+Pqgr685 9E6oBe+kIeqGEPAJgdZK3NCfa+AaZGCM9ulrE44/pp5IW+fy5DMt7fg7goxN6t503Qdx lCSRo/BVozBx3Zj9uznr7NEBaZQ+vJpgeBy6Nz2hjgJ5+I/tbS0lpdiZ1g4mUUsFxmV0 h23ot3tv9C2oowqUSv2j55rq5ZJBCsZY8zVZt0wWVIvi+mcmrUwtIwuB/rrEx0XOKV7A PNsw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV2xLOd32J7G8obfCmj9NCZE8Z/rKZWeA9A2YE4208Pqt/cvSnG WQ1kc3VGTVTuVIOJk0T1TOQBqP8wKo8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxpEW1Y8xJHyOkBaajlUN4Y39E+v9ExrC3+JygOPXs47MYzUBN0cdnJSzJFUIgReI45GA6Nrg== X-Received: by 2002:a02:bb08:: with SMTP id y8mr13143899jan.51.1561747980021; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (c-73-95-159-87.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.95.159.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w23sm2481400iod.12.2019.06.28.11.52.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:52:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Walmsley X-X-Sender: paulw@viisi.sifive.com To: damon cc: palmer@sifive.com, sorear2@gmail.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, anup.patel@wdc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: redefine PTRS_PER_PGD/PTRS_PER_PMD/PTRS_PER_PTE In-Reply-To: <1556093512-5006-1-git-send-email-liush.damon@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <1556093512-5006-1-git-send-email-liush.damon@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 24 Apr 2019, damon wrote: > Use the number of addresses to define the relevant macros. > > Signed-off-by: damon This patch looks reasonable to me. But what's missing from the description is the motivation. Is this a prerequisite for another patch that you're planning to post? Or because you think this is clearer than the original? Or something else? etc. - Paul From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5990CC5B579 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3641D205F4 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="GbmyX2zJ"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=sifive.com header.i=@sifive.com header.b="T6kWLJqr" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3641D205F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sifive.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=mnGgQ+nL4Epr3RBqtaxQFRKqHUDy+rzgYv4UvDtEb4k=; b=GbmyX2zJhf63o3 Dv7mWn9mNLlt3i0c4D9fKuyI4qXTsYZPwzRlgM2KsmgMDqH5qliwcYdRfY+Zm6LK6oL/FTwznESqk YZ0GuvC/eMXBIFVRsxg655UryJcvO4EkZ4G6xxFA2rSbLkrcrS3uGnEjdA2ZfTiI0nQHN99nB85oV 1z/u6KbRcsqDVXiAUTKdQtyWz7jjmbVjdNxzNJNDOqZbWNXW8s4JGx9a0iSFtwlehuVwFtpT6i4B2 AR0rzRndUa45t78BuwH0+6roMdNDh/x4MU2J6QrB5+CYGGGBQoem8rS+NskV84EXKaUtiH3cyxzyq xYOrefpOldD7zV+AYIrA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hgvzc-0002ko-Lp; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:53:04 +0000 Received: from mail-io1-xd44.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d44]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hgvzZ-0002jk-Gw for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:53:04 +0000 Received: by mail-io1-xd44.google.com with SMTP id e5so14674322iok.4 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:53:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=0vnkzi3BuJTyXx7KRAPPLKqoLRHPgMrkqNHgPj4DsWE=; b=T6kWLJqrYH5JG0ZpMsTWJYlyGp9L3SPHrYqLjVPcryv7lQnYlvRo3gyaCu9yw18RST Z87ehkfmmJPrNWqwbVGwO9zaTzKN6gap4ePTLSce7dgy/LWbvt+j+oH15CCz/kDxDRXT kU+5cB/xXZA8kY42vlqCnC82yo2PhgaWetCTG/BFjvvO3NEjkfHPPtVNtIdzkmKPSV9n sn1Tqp6C8V/RzMRtEteqgpcaDUHN/M557MGODv7f7gUChAz0zOz3c5iizFfLdZikIwK0 pGDBZemdSCGyArGmU3wNXGeWyE+g30zZSvPbbAKcxM1YICX3RCRnUn/dMCGi84YW3huv IBLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=0vnkzi3BuJTyXx7KRAPPLKqoLRHPgMrkqNHgPj4DsWE=; b=KRc2bhlG3b/knTSPPMSLp9118FUgTC2UB3diZC0B7Q8ayzaS8g8rO25TCv0RZ5dGzJ zEv++dBrmjx32xCAjynBLYm/AldLzJtNdfH4pzrGqT+Zat2qKQzNQmCCxoQSz6fgZjiy SSP/aeZr6RXLnV9c7B0Vh4Iw/6cZBXqXV0+ZIuxG3ES3T8LrYa36IyGIj/5PrnSl6lqA Qq5d6iFfR4hMfRb6By03WkLS9eng3fhu4pF9D9k2CX29FhstAL3UgU9rWIaB4WW8zw0S xn6au/xf9Po5xwLHOC3SUpBvkrlYqjl/XH/0DzJPso64v5ePsRTbO+pBLkRRnf3mMQ1X VvVA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV7qFrhnFZCewu4p3py39XiBjAFnmuoeVUoTYP4Rf1nN9iGdfNb 2SByyRQIwkGBQ+NOJM1pHBpgqg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxpEW1Y8xJHyOkBaajlUN4Y39E+v9ExrC3+JygOPXs47MYzUBN0cdnJSzJFUIgReI45GA6Nrg== X-Received: by 2002:a02:bb08:: with SMTP id y8mr13143899jan.51.1561747980021; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (c-73-95-159-87.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.95.159.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w23sm2481400iod.12.2019.06.28.11.52.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:52:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Walmsley X-X-Sender: paulw@viisi.sifive.com To: damon Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: redefine PTRS_PER_PGD/PTRS_PER_PMD/PTRS_PER_PTE In-Reply-To: <1556093512-5006-1-git-send-email-liush.damon@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <1556093512-5006-1-git-send-email-liush.damon@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190628_115301_595768_40CB5F1B X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.86 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: sorear2@gmail.com, palmer@sifive.com, anup.patel@wdc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 24 Apr 2019, damon wrote: > Use the number of addresses to define the relevant macros. > > Signed-off-by: damon This patch looks reasonable to me. But what's missing from the description is the motivation. Is this a prerequisite for another patch that you're planning to post? Or because you think this is clearer than the original? Or something else? etc. - Paul _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv