From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE78CA9ECB for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 20:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8662087F for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 20:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sifive.com header.i=@sifive.com header.b="WJknctNb" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729736AbfJaUNt (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:13:49 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com ([209.85.166.68]:33054 "EHLO mail-io1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726741AbfJaUNs (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:13:48 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id n17so8263167ioa.0 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:13:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=edoR3drkOe7+sAAN2C14zGy1y4TkfH6JZVLoKAB2I1c=; b=WJknctNbQNnq4Hj+o22VpWRFtQqoOiBTkKHsk+HRvEVy3BoU1PzUyESIxTdd5FfBNH Da4DbpwX4BAQlSPVaEP7HsjwY9tNc8Rk0+O/ClWYh/dL8GvxUSFIlW/xtAbIp8ssk2d4 4QMY/4gASgyN4iTUy8LHtcceXfR3Fmirw1+KY5PwZIJ9oFB1X6Lq4K59XRIj4RQGfD5Q HyWcdFwWXhpYTk5RAIfNZVGGNH1JTPuKcCPvlNICWWRvaBP4hzyhKAVU1SKNYydCzfKm qlvJ+WFDWwM6b19TOzxn0xl7auPIlqje8Z+XWsHJNp7ymmWMhE3tHe7oKrh2Q00rf+iN FPTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=edoR3drkOe7+sAAN2C14zGy1y4TkfH6JZVLoKAB2I1c=; b=sZqMeOLLUP1g7MZ7GGofiKHLkp7T5R0Abzxw7JYqAlAxnyU7g5K1EDY81E+rw/IdWy /KtUWRgCLuwDTd8OuYUZHxBs2ai/IKJl18xiwN66TwiVh4nHUyOtjjI+HkNfXe2+llwd DRtsnzL+IZ12W97fMk4dnwabDgAXCgbQAk0uBAK06B329vppkgetUN7MOxyKmf9tQBHQ LPokTHs5Mr34M1Zl5NQ/NBDAcLGr/bpFjIPA2CyYCUGZ29eFXW0XgoELjfryC4OGt8cc 7obDcwawvy91JWoTwsgMu+PK2PWEUmv8Jw4LbtW4JViTJxotFg6roVk9Slehr4AaS1vk /ypg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWAV1FEsiL5tkFzuy1E96+gqn9AGsozYjio6CROhQWF8chXifwd I9D83FY+Eo8EB5g7uEGtSGsKFg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwu18NgGtxYghLIqdGrPlyUezIGUUPxppmYLKUKXEShdep9/77fPJTZMl39SlwLPxfbxPxnCg== X-Received: by 2002:a02:cc66:: with SMTP id j6mr1049512jaq.61.1572552827929; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([64.62.168.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h11sm436841ioq.57.2019.10.31.13.13.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:13:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Walmsley X-X-Sender: paulw@viisi.sifive.com To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Damien Le Moal , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RISC-V nommu support v6 In-Reply-To: <20191031155222.GA7270@lst.de> Message-ID: References: <20191028121043.22934-1-hch@lst.de> <20191031155222.GA7270@lst.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 31 Oct 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 01:21:21PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > I tried building this series from your git branch mentioned above, and > > booted it with a buildroot userspace built from your custom buildroot > > tree. Am seeing some segmentation faults from userspace (below). > > > > Am still planning to merge your patches. > > > > But I'm wondering whether you are seeing these segmentation faults also? > > Or is it something that might be specific to my test setup? > > I just built a fresh image using make -j4 with that report and it works > perfectly fine with my tree. OK, good to know. If there are other folks out there who are using Christoph's nommu patch set, it'd be great to get testing feedback. - Paul From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58418CA9ECB for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 20:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BAD92087F for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 20:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="edvRu2iU"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=sifive.com header.i=@sifive.com header.b="WJknctNb" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2BAD92087F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sifive.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ozqGP6vy9pGpHt0rlw26mJvepA6QvxJsnSCzq6aJg3Y=; b=edvRu2iU5Nupln z+CTu75dYQZxh5uSfP7Q4s74+KoPrFAM58jTcSC/NSQs0Ss5UFj7dq0y03f/3aHblapKZwK/FFqXE ULOo9kZByk/TK4qKyPO63JqbsSKI0N8zknxsmXlY04zmBz68edhGhT9OwYR3ydqfBq4FXvQBB5dH9 pBsB8p5/ZYicH21wZg1RF2QrFoAUX+DQQJvMK/fg/Gy29cpSH24PAHnJ3Hd3W7FUGZIlpysCDiDep wMuLkmyIa7nNFMdjGLU6k3TvSIkSwhVYfgP/0BtXnCmFZLUb6Hh8VT9WZOwym0qLnYO36MgVmBIDf 17E/XtaJFfKOfyuxCqcw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iQGpN-00082W-97; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 20:13:53 +0000 Received: from mail-io1-xd44.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d44]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iQGpK-000820-35 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 20:13:51 +0000 Received: by mail-io1-xd44.google.com with SMTP id c11so8202231iom.10 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:13:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=edoR3drkOe7+sAAN2C14zGy1y4TkfH6JZVLoKAB2I1c=; b=WJknctNbQNnq4Hj+o22VpWRFtQqoOiBTkKHsk+HRvEVy3BoU1PzUyESIxTdd5FfBNH Da4DbpwX4BAQlSPVaEP7HsjwY9tNc8Rk0+O/ClWYh/dL8GvxUSFIlW/xtAbIp8ssk2d4 4QMY/4gASgyN4iTUy8LHtcceXfR3Fmirw1+KY5PwZIJ9oFB1X6Lq4K59XRIj4RQGfD5Q HyWcdFwWXhpYTk5RAIfNZVGGNH1JTPuKcCPvlNICWWRvaBP4hzyhKAVU1SKNYydCzfKm qlvJ+WFDWwM6b19TOzxn0xl7auPIlqje8Z+XWsHJNp7ymmWMhE3tHe7oKrh2Q00rf+iN FPTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=edoR3drkOe7+sAAN2C14zGy1y4TkfH6JZVLoKAB2I1c=; b=qMz7IgPpI+ivGA+SzLZEmoDuimKS9hgxt2eo3gE+JovXuFmDZr15ySlOxpwU5aMC3a c0c8Esq2U+7Wa0maD3KrI8oCqsRZqPCOSQw+C6MdsNqgEyCq0YVEFxZmYTcGhx+0Mk3l 23usji7cJQLDOrY0TZJUQfThHyX0xFF6hsMtiVv41TS6/JSILCVjIfJLypPzT5muCDFS NDfr201ID9XpRntYTMI49U+kduaIIfNnHqv7B8j6ddRKVEFzw0OAzYbd4Nt4x9kBSQjX AtDkbbSmCZCTLgHJUXf1ItkhU6e/+szIOjYJ8wEZDIL4Suw1+xTucoNd2eI2SnGHIxVT RU2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW6HMtZtaWWoAuDB6C7u8GYGLLHPt1F2VgsN9irZZWwb37G4y0Y btB6jYl2GCNSUlwy8wL2iSE5fGbd23o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwu18NgGtxYghLIqdGrPlyUezIGUUPxppmYLKUKXEShdep9/77fPJTZMl39SlwLPxfbxPxnCg== X-Received: by 2002:a02:cc66:: with SMTP id j6mr1049512jaq.61.1572552827929; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([64.62.168.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h11sm436841ioq.57.2019.10.31.13.13.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:13:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Walmsley X-X-Sender: paulw@viisi.sifive.com To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: RISC-V nommu support v6 In-Reply-To: <20191031155222.GA7270@lst.de> Message-ID: References: <20191028121043.22934-1-hch@lst.de> <20191031155222.GA7270@lst.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191031_131350_164083_CACDE27E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.76 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Damien Le Moal , Palmer Dabbelt , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 31 Oct 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 01:21:21PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > I tried building this series from your git branch mentioned above, and > > booted it with a buildroot userspace built from your custom buildroot > > tree. Am seeing some segmentation faults from userspace (below). > > > > Am still planning to merge your patches. > > > > But I'm wondering whether you are seeing these segmentation faults also? > > Or is it something that might be specific to my test setup? > > I just built a fresh image using make -j4 with that report and it works > perfectly fine with my tree. OK, good to know. If there are other folks out there who are using Christoph's nommu patch set, it'd be great to get testing feedback. - Paul _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv