From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DEEC433EB for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 16:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C9220714 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 16:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727797AbgGZQGO (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:06:14 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:40373 "EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726666AbgGZQGN (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:06:13 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,399,1589234400"; d="scan'208";a="355317427" Received: from abo-173-121-68.mrs.modulonet.fr (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.121.173]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jul 2020 18:06:12 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 18:06:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: question about sharedsubtree.rst Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Documentation/filesystems/sharedsubtree.rst contains the following: ->mnt_flags takes two more flags to indicate the propagation status of the vfsmount. MNT_SHARE indicates that the vfsmount is a shared vfsmount. MNT_UNCLONABLE indicates that the vfsmount cannot be replicated. I guess that MNT_SHARE should be MNT_SHARED. More seriously, MNT_UNCLONABLE seems to have never existed, except in a patch proposed in 2005: https://lists.linuxcoding.com/kernel/2005-q3/msg01881.html Should there be a description of MNT_UNBINDABLE instead? Or something else? thanks, julia