From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77845C433EF for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 21:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95B616109F for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 21:31:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 95B616109F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=inria.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=inria.fr IronPort-Data: =?us-ascii?q?A9a23=3A/ScDdK/YhRutOzTEENP2DrUDkX+TJUtcMsCJ2f8?= =?us-ascii?q?bfWQNrUom32EOmjMaC22Baf2Ia2CheNB0O4q09hlU6sLQy9RgQVdlrnsFo1Bi+?= =?us-ascii?q?ZOUX4zBRqvTF3rPdZObFBoPA/3z27AsFehsJpPnjkrrYueJQUVUj/nSH+OlULO?= =?us-ascii?q?cYUideCc/IMsfoUM68wIGqt4w6TSJK1vlVeLa+6UzCnf9s9JHGj58B5a4lf9al?= =?us-ascii?q?K+aVAX0EbAJTasjUFf2zxH5BX+ETE27ByOQroJ8RoZWSwtfpYxV8F81/z91Yj+?= =?us-ascii?q?kuq3qd1UDBL/UJwmHzHRMM0SgqkEY9mpjieBiaqBaMBkP49mKt4kZJNFlvpu7Q?= =?us-ascii?q?gZsObLKlf41Uh9CEig4M7cuFLrveyLi6pHKlyUqdFOpmZ2CFnoeNooT8edfCHt?= =?us-ascii?q?F9f0GJSpLbR2Zge+yhrWhRYFEjMU4N9jlMqsQv3hhyXfSCvNOaZvETqPH4/dX2?= =?us-ascii?q?T4xgoZFGvO2T8YQb3xtKgvBZxlOM1IMIJ07leaswHL4dlVwpFuLpKYs5G7fwgN?= =?us-ascii?q?1+LfoOdvRPNeNQK19kkvevWXb7W2/CRYAOdqDyDyt/Xelh+uJliT+MKoZD6C88?= =?us-ascii?q?u9Cj1qUyWgeThYRUDOTq/S/h0K/WM53K0EV/Cdot68591fDZtL5WBqjiHyEtRo?= =?us-ascii?q?bXMEWGOo/gCmBw6zV7gLfAmUWRTdHb/Qitck/Xzts0UWG9/viBSZuq6GSUXLb/?= =?us-ascii?q?LCZrTatMCwZIHUqYS4CRwoZpdLkpekOYrjnJjp4OLavidGwHTDr3z2RsXFuwbQ?= =?us-ascii?q?Vl88CkauhlW0rSgmE/vDhJjPZLC2ONo590j5EWQ=3D=3D?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,212,1631570400"; d="scan'208";a="2253510" Received: from prod-listesu18.inria.fr (HELO sympa.inria.fr) ([128.93.162.160]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2021 22:31:20 +0100 Received: by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix, from userid 20132) id 09B37E0295; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 22:31:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE880E004C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 22:31:16 +0100 (CET) IronPort-HdrOrdr: =?us-ascii?q?A9a23=3A4WbMi6zUViBr5GvgWJmCKrPwl71zdoMgy1kn?= =?us-ascii?q?xilNoNJuE/Bw8Pre+sjztCWE7wr5PUtLpTnuAsS9qB/nmaKdpLNhXotLsmHdyR?= =?us-ascii?q?eVxcJZnPbfKwSJIVyAygcl79YfT0EdMr3N5ClB/KLHCVKDYq8dKbC8mcjCuQ6d?= =?us-ascii?q?9QYOcegNUc5dBmxCe2Om+yNNKjWuLKBJZaa0145opyeAZX9SVciyHH8DNtKz3e?= =?us-ascii?q?HjpdbJYQMmGxVi0wWFjSqp5LnmeiLopSs2YndgwaoC7WOAqADy5ryiv/anjjfQ?= =?us-ascii?q?2nTe9Y4+oqqQ9vJzQOKNl+kIIXHXhgGkaJ8JYcz7gAwI?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,326,1620684000"; d="scan'208";a="398384434" Received: from 173.121.68.85.rev.sfr.net (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.121.173]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2021 22:31:16 +0100 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 22:31:15 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Vlastimil Babka cc: cocci@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <17a7a40f-b736-e0ea-02ae-1b03ef4483bf@suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <17a7a40f-b736-e0ea-02ae-1b03ef4483bf@suse.cz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [cocci] Need some help with spatch Reply-To: Julia Lawall X-Loop: cocci@inria.fr X-Sequence: 80 Errors-To: cocci-owner@inria.fr Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: cocci-request@inria.fr X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: > 3) eliminated whitespace including newlines > > This is stylistic but will require some postprocessing fixups if not solved. > There seem to be several cases like this where whitespace including newlines > is eliminated between two lines that are patched by the spatch: > > - struct page *page; > - > - page = container_of(h, struct page, rcu_head); > + struct slab *slab;slab = container_of(h, struct page, rcu_head); Which semantic patch causes this problem? julia