From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:57:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <200902221837.49396.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090224230935.GA15165@elte.hu> <200902250029.16107.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090226030050.GA3361@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Arve_Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , LKML , Jesse Barnes , Thomas Gleixner , "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , pm list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Arve Hj=F8nnev=E5g wrote: > = > I don't think this is a oddball case. It is very common to connect > keys or keypads to gpios. If these keys are wakeup keys, it is not OK > to loose interrupts during the suspend phase. .. and how many drivers is that? Is it one or two "gpio input drivers" or = is it a hundred? The "common" is not so much about "how many machines", but "in how many = drivers would you actually do this". Linus