From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:31:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <200902221837.49396.rjw@sisk.pl> <200903122243.27452.rjw@sisk.pl> <200903132256.51522.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200903132256.51522.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Frans Pop , LKML , Jesse Barnes , "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , pm list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); > > > > Ditto > > No, because of __setup_irq(). Sorry, forgot about that. Ok. Keep the locking in pm.c then. Thanks, tglx