From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Performance issue: initial git clone causes massive repack Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:14:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20090405T001239Z@curie.orbis-terrarum.net> <20090405035453.GB12927@vidovic> <20090405070412.GB869@curie-int> <20090405190213.GA12929@vidovic> <20090405225954.GA18730@vidovic> <20090406T140124Z@curie.orbis-terrarum.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Git Mailing List To: "Robin H. Johnson" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 06 16:16:29 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lqpcf-00075G-BA for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:16:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754157AbZDFOOx (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:14:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752970AbZDFOOx (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:14:53 -0400 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:48345 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751268AbZDFOOx (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:14:53 -0400 Received: from xanadu.home ([66.131.194.97]) by VL-MO-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KHO00ITVNKLI890@VL-MO-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:14:45 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home In-reply-to: <20090406T140124Z@curie.orbis-terrarum.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > I haven't read all this morning submissions to the thread yet, but I > wanted to make two posts before I leave on a trip (in ~20 minutes), and > I'll be back late on Thursday. > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:29:04AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > To me, this is a non-issue (if the content of these objects are > > > secret, then why are they here at all on a public server?), but I > > > think there were discussions here about it (can't find the right > > > keywords to dig the archives though), and other people may think > > > differently. > > Guess who was involved in that discussion... > > I may allow you to pull certain branches directly from my own PC through > > the git native protocol. That doesn't mean you have direct access to > > the whole of any of the packs I have on my disk. > If the native rsync protocol is allowed to the repo, then that argument > is moot. The rsync protocol is _not_ the native git protocol. And I personally don't encourage its usage either, except as a _temporary_ workaround for unresolved issues. You will never see this protocol available from any git server I maintain. Nicolas