From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/12] ACPI / PM: Add more run-time wake-up fields Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:39:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <200912272057.10443.rjw@sisk.pl> <200912272105.30352.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.9]:40864 "EHLO vms173009pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752289Ab0AHUkN (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:40:13 -0500 In-reply-to: <200912272105.30352.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jesse Barnes , Matthew Garrett , LKML , pm list , Alan Stern , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux PCI , Oliver Neukum , Bjorn Helgaas , Shaohua Li , Francois Romieu > Use the run_wake flag to mark all devices for which run-time wake-up > events may be generated by the platform. Introduce a new wake-up > flag, special, for marking devices that should be permanently enabled > to generate run-time events. how about calling the flag "always_enabled" rather than "special"? otherwise, Acked-by: Len Brown