From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752876Ab0CXABW (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:01:22 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:51025 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751607Ab0CXABV (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:01:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:55:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Ingo Molnar cc: Anton Starikov , Greg KH , stable@kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance In-Reply-To: <20100323233640.GA16798@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20100323102208.512c16cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100323173409.GA24845@elte.hu> <9D040E9A-80F2-468F-A6CD-A4912615CD3F@gmail.com> <9FC34DA1-D6DD-41E5-8B76-0712A813C549@gmail.com> <20100323233640.GA16798@elte.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > We havent had any stability problems with them, except one trivial build bug, > so -stable would be nice. Oh, you're right. There was that UML build bug. But I think that was included in the list of commits Anton had - commit 4126faf0ab ("x86: Fix breakage of UML from the changes in the rwsem system"). Linus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C0D6B01B6 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:01:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:55:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance In-Reply-To: <20100323233640.GA16798@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20100323102208.512c16cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100323173409.GA24845@elte.hu> <9D040E9A-80F2-468F-A6CD-A4912615CD3F@gmail.com> <9FC34DA1-D6DD-41E5-8B76-0712A813C549@gmail.com> <20100323233640.GA16798@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Anton Starikov , Greg KH , stable@kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra List-ID: On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > We havent had any stability problems with them, except one trivial build bug, > so -stable would be nice. Oh, you're right. There was that UML build bug. But I think that was included in the list of commits Anton had - commit 4126faf0ab ("x86: Fix breakage of UML from the changes in the rwsem system"). Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org