From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:43143 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753883Ab0DGW0a (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:26:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:22:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Al Viro cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maciej Rutecki , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 In-Reply-To: <20100407221941.GL30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <6Pphclm24fK.A.lSF.qsPvLB@chimera> <20100407221941.GL30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote: > > No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate() > return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has > ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter... Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc? Linus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <6Pphclm24fK.A.lSF.qsPvLB@chimera> <20100407221941.GL30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100407221941.GL30031-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Al Viro Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maciej Rutecki , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote: > > No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate() > return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has > ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter... Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc? Linus