From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:43:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20110117192050.GE23331@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <0557426516de482c1769a50fa0b5f17a@mail.gmail.com> <20110208164747.GD6188@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <78d0134576ace6be5874871076cf0c10@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:34921 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755328Ab1BHUnP (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:43:15 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home ([66.130.28.92]) by vl-mh-mrz25.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0LGB003D6G6CZJB0@vl-mh-mrz25.ip.videotron.ca> for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:42:12 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: <78d0134576ace6be5874871076cf0c10@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Santosh Shilimkar Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > > I think it's probably going to be better to _purposely_ break the > > OMAP build when it covers v6 and v7 CPUs in these kernels as I don't > > think it's sanely fixable given where we are. Agreed. At least making SMP unavailable when both v6 and v7 are configured should be small and good enough for 2.6.38-rc5. > Any alternative possible other than breaking the omap2plus build? > It's quite useful to have one build which covers majority of the > omap machines. Just merge this patch series in your testing tree, or create two configs (two builds) instead of only (a broken) one. Or use linux-next for testing which would be even more beneficial. Nicolas From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:43:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels In-Reply-To: <78d0134576ace6be5874871076cf0c10@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110117192050.GE23331@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <0557426516de482c1769a50fa0b5f17a@mail.gmail.com> <20110208164747.GD6188@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <78d0134576ace6be5874871076cf0c10@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > > I think it's probably going to be better to _purposely_ break the > > OMAP build when it covers v6 and v7 CPUs in these kernels as I don't > > think it's sanely fixable given where we are. Agreed. At least making SMP unavailable when both v6 and v7 are configured should be small and good enough for 2.6.38-rc5. > Any alternative possible other than breaking the omap2plus build? > It's quite useful to have one build which covers majority of the > omap machines. Just merge this patch series in your testing tree, or create two configs (two builds) instead of only (a broken) one. Or use linux-next for testing which would be even more beneficial. Nicolas