From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751004Ab1ETEG5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2011 00:06:57 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:41678 "EHLO mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750757Ab1ETEG4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2011 00:06:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 23:54:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home To: Kyungmin Park cc: Shawn Guo , Linus Walleij , Jonas Aaberg , Sascha Hauer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , Lee Jones , Linus Walleij , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mach-u300: rewrite gpio driver, move to drivers/gpio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1303910002-3333-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20110519085638.GA26816@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <20110519135631.GB26816@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <20110519191156.GE2429@pengutronix.de> <20110520031818.GB27251@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 May 2011, Kyungmin Park wrote: > BTW, how do you think the GPIO interrupt routine. If it uses the > drivers/gpio drivers, it also cover the gpio interrupt codes at > drivers/gpio? or separate it? Let's just do the move for now. I don't think it is worth splitting out the IRQ code just yet, unless there is a common pattern to be seen there. Nicolas From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 23:54:12 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [PATCH 02/10] mach-u300: rewrite gpio driver, move to drivers/gpio In-Reply-To: References: <1303910002-3333-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20110519085638.GA26816@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <20110519135631.GB26816@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <20110519191156.GE2429@pengutronix.de> <20110520031818.GB27251@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 20 May 2011, Kyungmin Park wrote: > BTW, how do you think the GPIO interrupt routine. If it uses the > drivers/gpio drivers, it also cover the gpio interrupt codes at > drivers/gpio? or separate it? Let's just do the move for now. I don't think it is worth splitting out the IRQ code just yet, unless there is a common pattern to be seen there. Nicolas