From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755432Ab1JQJje (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 05:39:34 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:53537 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751893Ab1JQJjd (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 05:39:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:39:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ian Campbell cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , xen-devel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen: IPI interrupts not resumed early enough on suspend/resume In-Reply-To: <1318843504.16132.1.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Message-ID: References: <1317654626.21903.72.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1317668908.11991.20.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <1318001583.21903.355.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1318251990.21903.433.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1318598637.21903.889.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1318713254.11016.52.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <1318843504.16132.1.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 09:51 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 14:23 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > Ping? The original issue has made it into longterm-2.6.32.y and then > > > > onto Debian (bug #644604) so people keep asking me about it... > > > > > > Sorry, the previous version had a warning in it (was missing the return > > > type for resume_irqs), fixed up version follows. > > > > > > I noticed that the backport to longterm 2.6.32 won't work since syscore > > > isn't available back then. I think one approach for the backport would > > > be to call irq_pm_syscore_resume() directly from sysdev_resume(), does > > > that sound sensible? > > > > I think so. Can you please add a description (or the five lines patch) > > for the stable folks to the changelog, so they don't have to dig > > around ? > > If you are happy with the mainline version I'll send out a backported > version to stable@. Fine. I queue the other one for 3.2 Thanks, tglx