From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752676AbaE0OqK (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2014 10:46:10 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f54.google.com ([209.85.192.54]:51973 "EHLO mail-qg0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752324AbaE0OqE (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2014 10:46:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 10:46:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Vincent Guittot cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Daniel Lezcano , Morten Rasmussen , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] sched: expel confusing usage of the term "power" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1401142779-6633-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 27 May 2014, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > There are still some use of "power" instead of "capacity" in the sched > directory like SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER, ARCH_POWER or NONTASK_POWER. They > should also be renamed in capacity as there are also used for capacity I thought the first one was used to identify CPU sharing the same (electric) power domain. Or maybe I confused it with SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN, illustrating the point once again for this series. I'll create additional patches. Nicolas