From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752365AbaIJXZm (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:25:42 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f177.google.com ([209.85.216.177]:41586 "EHLO mail-qc0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751763AbaIJXZk (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:25:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:25:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/idle : find the best idle CPU with cpuidle info In-Reply-To: <4753245.VagS0oaVYJ@vostro.rjw.lan> Message-ID: References: <1409844730-12273-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <4753245.VagS0oaVYJ@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 05:35:27 PM Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > Ping. > > Is this urgent, and if so, then why? What makes you think this could be urgent? After almost a week after the original posting without any feedback, one may simply wonder if things could have accidentally fell into a crack, that's all. > > > On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > > This is a rework of the series initially posted by Daniel Lezcano here: > > > > > > http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.linux.power-management.general/thread=44161 > > > > > > Those patches were straightened up, commit logs are more comprehensive, > > > bugs were fixed, etc. > > > > > > > > > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 6 ++++++ > > > kernel/sched/fair.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > > kernel/sched/idle.c | 6 ++++++ > > > kernel/sched/sched.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 4 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > Nicolas > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > linaro-kernel mailing list > > > linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org > > > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-kernel > > > > > > > > -- > I speak only for myself. > Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. > >